did you think they will work better?
Well, the 'products' are not yet produced.
I hope the might do better, but I don't know it.
Solana will get pretty much financial support.
The Cardano founder had a rather interesting conversation with Ben Goertzel from SingularityNET.
IMO Hive as a reward token doesn't work. It should be an investor token.
My idea is that there could be two different pools. People who consider themselves as investors could put their HIVE into the 'investor pool' where they get interests for their investment (call it "staking"). My idea is that who decides to go for the investment pool shouldn't be able at the same time to vote on posts. Then they wouldn't have the pressure to earn curation reward by doing automated 'curation'.
Users who consider themselves as authors and/or real manual curators wouldn't get interest on their money in their pool but could earn curation rewards from voting for good content manually (only manually!). Of course a whale who is really interested in content could decide to put his HIVE in the "author/curator" pool, instead to choose the pure investor pool.
Concerning the tokenized web I wonder about two things:
- It is already very complicated for 'non-crypto' people to handle a platform based on one single coin/token like HIVE. I fear it could be way too complex to juggle with many different token.
- I wonder if people see enough value in layer 2 token if already layer 1 token is struggling. Yes, this 'value question' always lets me doubt.
But well ... lets wait and see how things develop.
L2 tokens will have only value based on revenue. L2 will be pretty much the same as Web2 today,
I also think hive is to complex for most. Gamers maybe can handle it, because they already a lot on the computer. But average Web2 users will have problems.