That's all fine. I understand both approaches. I can only use one.
The poster is the one who entered the public space first. If they cannot handle feedback, they do not have to post on a blockchain. There are other options available.
You probably miss how many people do not care for the discussion. It might be a vote size issue. It is more rude to skip your comment than mine.
Of course you must handle feedbacks if you are posting on a blockchain, also the negative ones, and nobody was complaining about your downvotes, so they can handle this of course on their own.
I just saw the downvotes and found no reason for that, so its only a general discussion.
Downvotes are negative feedback, but discussion first is usually the better way of giving a feedback for content you dont like, in my point of view.
Best regards.
Lieben Dank für Deinen Support :)
!BEER
!LUV
<><
@balte, you've been given LUV from @kryptodenno.
Check the LUV in your H-E wallet. (3/10)