I feel that no system is built without loopholes, I've been pondering how viable it would be if exchanges are only used for trading and not holding, will there be another option to forestall better security? I guess this talk of protection and security is why government agencies will be looking to place regulate crypto.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Imagine being told your wealth has be siezed following a bankruptcy?
Now that isn't a loophole but a deliberate implementation that's frankly injust. Centralised exchanges are not exactly crypto friendly in the long run...
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
This is unarguably true, I have just been thinking how people would react to better decentralized options.
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile
That you have to fight for it in bankruptcy court like any other creditor.
So users of the exchange are effectively lending money to it by that mindset.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Well with the original premise of Bitcoin, there were no loopholes.
Your keys, your crypto. Fairly simple.
However, rather limited in what it can do.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Well, I still believe crypto is in its early stages, I guess we don't expect everything to click and be perfect instantaneously, there's time to get it right
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile