You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2025-03-13 18:47

in LeoFinance7 days ago

Most influential voices in the sector tend to be unmotivated, extractive, and inconsistent. Their opinions align with the most popular trends.

Sort:  

The current widespread bearish sentiment is seen as a promising indicator, potentially setting the stage for a significant upswing for $AVA.

"Here are some observations. Many leading commentators come off as unremarkable and lethargic.

They are often slow to latch onto new narratives and typically only comment on a coin after acquiring it.

These individuals rarely support market leaders, often resorting to last-minute trades that cater to those who missed earlier opportunities.

For instance, with $EMP, if the market cap of Virtuals is around 5 billion, it becomes simple to offload a 1 billion piece; it’s merely another AI-driven launchpad.

Similarly, with $ARC, while some hype Virtuals on a different chain, its value remains understated until momentum builds, much like a game of musical chairs.

Other cases include $TRISIG, trading in sympathy with $AIXBT, where an undervaluation points to a likely decline, and $NEUR, falling in line with similar patterns.

The rationale is clear: while the current sentiment may boost all AI-related projects, investing in underdog ventures backed by such followers is less appealing if true innovation exists. $AVA represents a leading multimodal audiovisual AI

framework combined with a no-code, multiplatform launchpad—essentially an upgraded version of what the so-called Virtuals offer.

Other projects like $ALCH, which pioneers a no-code app development platform designed to disrupt conventional app distribution models, $AIXBT, promising enhanced AI agent capabilities while remaining market leaders, and $AI16Z, the largest

open-source AI framework whose ultimate efficacy remains to be seen, illustrate the spectrum of offerings in the market."