- not sure why you are getting so many wrap failures. I notice yours more frequently than others. We have made the bridges VASTLY more reliable and wrap/unwrap fails happen a very small fraction of the time
- bounties for delegations are not missing. We’ve had maybe 5-10 missed payments EVER and those were all recouperated into payouts afterwards
- APRs on the UI are 100% accurate. We had about a 14 hour period where the API went down and we had to work all night to deploy a fix
- polygon chain is generally harder to use but I never have issues with it. Main issue is that people don’t set high enough gas which is a UX issue primarily as that can be fixed by setting higher gas limits in metamask
I appreciate candid feedback but we are on the bleeding edge of technology. As a user of bleeding edge tech, you need to expect constant failures and constant improvements.
I know that constant improvements are being deployed because I’m a part of the team that works 80 hours per week to fix them. Expecting things to never break is a horrifyingly high expectation for new technology. A more realistic expectation is to expect that things break but also expect that the team behind it is fixing them.
If you feel that this second expectation is not being met, then using technology that is new and rapidly iterated on should not be an activity you do.
So while I appreciate candid feedback I feel that these sentiments are expectations of the first kind: expecting new technology to work flawlessly at every turn. We’ll keep pushing to improve things as we always have. Progress is our motivation.
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile
I understand how things work, so I'm still here supporting all leofinance projects. Heavy invested. Even way more than most of your fanbois. But don't expect many new investors or users to pile in and stay. They have too many problems transacting with the chain. Five heavy upvoted posts on trading don't help either. You don't need to do marketing on the leofinance site I guess.
Please don't waste your time answering me. I just want to shed some light on the dark side.
But be more realistic with numbers and promises.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
UX (User eXperience) issues may not seem like much, but they have been known to kill entire projects if not handled in a timely manner. Usually they are cosmetic in nature, but occasionally they mask a functional problem. The fewer UX issues exist, the better PolyCub and all other LeoFinance projects will be in the long run.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Yes and as I replied above; candid feedback is always appreciated. We even deployed a whole system in discord for reporting bugs on the UIs yet I don’t see many using that to report all the bugs they interact with.
When building on the bleeding edge, we move fast and break a lot of shit. I think some expectations need to be cured to reality. The reality is that we release products and iterate rapidly to improve them - as any startup does. I’m actually quite happy with our team’s pace in terms of deploying updates and fixes. That being said, improvement is our middle name and we’ll always push to be better
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile
I just want to confirm that the LeoFinance Discord server (
https://discord.gg/E4jePHe) is the place where tech support is given for trouble with anything related for PolyCub. At the PolyCub site I didn't see any indication of a Discord server, so I'm guessing that the server used by LeoFinance is being used for PolyCub tech support.Posted Using LeoFinance Beta