I think the top ranking content should earn a lot. I see what you’re saying though - we need to ensure that the competition is a fair competition.
That being said, it seems like it would make sense that if you put in the blood, sweat and tears to make something rank high in the long-run, you should get paid for that.
I just wonder if there are other ways. I mentioned the idea above of creating a ranking algorithm.
Another idea: have different prizes for different metrics. I.e.
- #1 ranking article for traffic the past week = 100 LEO prize
- “Rising Star” article each week is the article that jumped the rankings the fastest = 100 LEO prize
- … etc.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I totally get your point and I agree. I somewhat answered this in my other comment where I talked about having a limit. Increase that to 5K or 10K LEO, whatever floats your boat, but I do think that having a limit could decrease the potential risk of people trying to cheat their way to glory.
This is a cool idea. The more the merrier, as it would increase the overall competition for those various prizes meaning more organic traffic over time.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta