Currently, it's possible to engage (i..e leave a vote or comment) without generating a click or view on Threads, as it counts towards ad revenue. Is there a way this can be optimized so all engagements count as clicks? #feedback
Well, I've seen a few threads that have comments without having any clicks/views counted, which is why this question popped up. Ideally, votes would come after clicking the thread. Maybe the counter just didn't update at the time I saw it?
Currently, it's possible to engage (i..e leave a vote or comment) without generating a click or view on Threads, as it counts towards ad revenue. Is there a way this can be optimized so all engagements count as clicks? #feedback
Votes arent pageviews.
Comments should be done after opening the thread or by right clicking out of notis.
You keep trying to game the system.
Well, I've seen a few threads that have comments without having any clicks/views counted, which is why this question popped up. Ideally, votes would come after clicking the thread. Maybe the counter just didn't update at the time I saw it?
Call it "testing the UI." ;)
I'm done with the 1000 clicks / 15 minutes experiment. It was useful once!
To be honest, the numbers can get crazy very quickly.
Think about what Twitter has and the number of tweets with thousands of views. They are all over the place.
Capture a small portion of that and we can see something magical.
Exactly! REAL engagement adds value. Someone just going through and systematically saying "yes" to everything they can click on does not...