The chance of this is almost ZERO. Especially in the world of crypto. So it's completely unnecessary.
I think most think this exact thing. Im not far away from that opinion myself. But... consider this.
What if you had a bundle of cryptocurrencies, using 1 brand based on agreed upon base values, marketed together and offered to the market under the same financial instrument in equal and fair distribution.
In a sense... Instead of 5 horses pulling 5 wagons, you have 5 horses pulling 1 wagon.
Is there a loser then?
The horses are the question. Are they equally strong, equally pulling? Therefore, will one horse depend on another to a different degree? Either one can fall, and pull all the rest. Do they eat the same amount?
When it comes to horses, the Amish would certainly have several more questions.😃
I generally think, everything better on your own.
Doesnt matter. Theyre represented on a fair basis based on market valuation. Even the weakest community pulling along the strongest one still does its proportional work for proportional gain.
You just want to pick them so theyre relatively close in size.
Financial instrument creates an incentive for mutual support without there having to actually be direct cross promotion. Its done automatically.
Everyone benefits while remaining focused on themselves.