That's a good point. So if you do not understand the author's style of writing, does it make the content a low quality one
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That's a good point. So if you do not understand the author's style of writing, does it make the content a low quality one
It's all about people's judgment, for someone you are a decent person, and someone may consider you a scoundrel, because you once stepped on his foot in the bus :)
Well, there's a fact in that.
That means you won't get support for the post even if it's a quality one just because you had a score with someone, is that really cool?
Moreover, quality content can get negative votes if the whales don't like you giving tips to your friends, which is your direct right, because you did not steal the coins put for this.
I think that you will find hundreds of people who did not please the crazy ideas of whales and stopped getting votes for very voluminous and meaningful posts.
Of course, there are many of them. It's a sad one.
When evaluating a post, the fact that people have different mentalities, different mindsets and different attitudes to communication is not taken into account.
Interactions in the form of comments should not determine the quality of a post and its value, sometimes cutlets, sometimes flies :)
In fact, now comments are put on a step above posts, but this is absolutely wrong... this can be regarded as discrimination against people who may simply be shy to communicate :)
... for example, you have little time left after writing a post and you can not leave the required number of comments, that's it, say goodbye to votes for your content.
Some people like to read comics, and some need to read the War and Peace trilogy, you can't compare the work of Leo Tolstoy and Robert Sheckley with his very short stories, but size does not determine quality :)
Hmmm, Size?
Yes, the stupidest parameter is "reading time". One short moment can make our day better, but it is not taken into account and a sparkling thought is not considered as something qualitative.
Well understood. Thanks for the insight.
Good luck in finding a recipe for a quality post! :)