You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is the concept of ‘valuable content’ subjective?

in LeoFinance2 years ago

I was going to post a comment relevant to this post, but you can guess what happened. So I'll publish it as a stand-alone post instead.

One of the points I was going to make was driving traffic to the leofinance.com domain as much as we can.

In my case, there is older content I had published at other Hive domains which I had referred to on occasion; I can rectify that by publishing updated posts here.

That still leaves the sticky issue of image hosting (currently, not at leofinance.io). I have an idea for handling that, but it may not fly with the dev team or with ownership.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

The way that Khal is going to get the token price to go up is to generate ad revenue off content on leofinance.io and then use that revenue to buy/burn LEO.

The idea is that these buy/burns will eventually outpace inflation emissions of LEO being paid to new content creators as rewards, and as such, supply/demand will push price up.

So all that matters is driving maximum traffic to any and every page on leofinance.io.


In my case, there is older content I had published at other Hive domains which I had referred to on occasion; I can rectify that by publishing updated posts here.

Just gotta figure out whether doing that would generate ongoing traffic for leofinance.io?

Would Google rank those new pages that you re-published, or would they view them as copies of content that is already hosted on another domain and indexed by Google?


That still leaves the sticky issue of image hosting (currently, not at leofinance.io). I have an idea for handling that, but it may not fly with the dev team or with ownership.

Remember, unlike the value of the HIVE token, the value of the LEO token doesn't come from decentralisation.

All that matters is that Google indexes the leofinance.io page and therefore the traffic views ads.

Where the images displayed on those pages are hosted, doesn't have a huge impact on SEO.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

To go with what Khal is doing, I can publish content at LeoFiannce first and delay posting at my domain for, say, a month so that search engines have enough time to pick up leofinance.io.

Posting updated versions of pre-LeoFinance content eligible for posting at LeoFinance will give the new content the leofinance.io domain, which means search engines will pick them up. The earlier content was virtually invisible, so the newer versions should be more useful for the leofinance.io domain.

As far as how Google ranks the newer pages, I would add enough updates to make them bona fide new pages. Newer H1 and H2s should help, too, since originally I didn't know much about SEO.

If images don't have much influence on driving traffic to leofinance.io, then I won't sweat it. Even so, I would still try to find a non-spammy way to get them to drive traffic to leofinance.io.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta