Sort:  

Probably, but highly exhausting imo...

I doubt it. 3,300 per day is impossible.

If you're working 24hrs, if we're to look at 6hrs daily, that'd need like 555 threads every hour, meaning minimum of 9 every minute, lol, definitely impossible.

Not to be anything legitimate.

1,000 per day would be very tough and that would only be 30K.

So 100K is like 3,300 per day.

I did this math and got curious if such person exists, haha, that's definitely a hell lot of textual content.

Doing 5K in a month would be a big step forward.

I would call it a spam bot because 2-3 threads per minute is not possible to make anything meaningful or useful for others. Less and more quality imo.

Yeah, figured, rather unrealistic

No, you need to sleep and feed.

Yeah, however, I do sometimes wonder how much interactions we used to make on social networks like Facebook because I know for a fact that I used to make a lot when I was into it and I wasn't getting paid, lol.

I keep fb only to show my parents that I'm alive when travel and as a birthday reminder.

Hardly.. ..would be tough to create that many even if just drafted and not actually threaded or even edited until later.

Would have to be like each #thread in about 1.7 seconds and that would barely allow for sleep and living needs.

#aced

What's a more realistic amount for you in a month

That's a good question. Unsure just yet. Matter of in part what is worth the time if I were to use more time for #threading it would help if it got X upvotes whatever that may be. Or simply #threading between in life. hmm..