I don't see an active downvote war in front of me right now. But it certainly is a topic that has caused 'forks' in the community. I'd like to solve all the tension grammatically without compromising on vital utility and I think it's possible.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think the current conversations about reward pools / downvoting is just people complaining because other tokens are going up and Hive is going sideways. TBH if Hive was above $1 no one would be wasting time on this topic
Well, there are a lot of factors contributing to the Layer1 of the Hive Blockchain and it's layer0 communities and Code Base. The code surrounding the voting mechanics are certainly not a reason for stability. In the coming months, we'll see Layer2 starting get in action and making waves. It's time to settle on a path that disables off-boarding via downvotes, still protects the reward pool and all of that mechanically. R0d0n is right with his analysis that AI will bring a big shift towards un-manageability, but that's just the next reason to settle on a code solution that makes the voting mechanics anti-fragile.
I disagree.
What R0d0n is proposing will cause another Layer 0 chain split.
And to be honest if Hive went above a $1 and stayed there this would not even be a conversation.
We can agree to disagree.
Hmm. Certainly different opinions can exist without causing any problems to each other.