an author also does not control how many votes he receives. That's the voters' decision.
A very unknown function, so unknown that it has only been used 1000 times by 279 accounts between May 9th and today. The known frontends do show it, only Inleo does not.
The fact that you are preventing a sales pressure of 330 k per year is a milquetoast calculation. Not everyone sells their hive, most of the ones I know are just powering up. You could also exclude those who make powerdowns from a vote. The pressure to sell remains with the people who do it and their hives become worth more because there is less inflation.
Lower inflation is of course also an advantage for you ;)
I never expected you to vote my shitty posts or to stop voting, but there is so much good content and projects on Hive that are worth supporting.
And in my opinion that could lead to more onboarding, more than Inleo's proposal.
It's actually been used over 350K times, at over 50K comments/day that's a drop in the bucket for the 7+ years we have been here.
It was also largely used by dapps to try to get manipulate rewards, but they failed to understand how the feature actually works and that it doesn't in fact increase authors rewards.
Average users use it less than 0.0000000000001% of the times. I'd say less than 0.001% of Hive users even know it exists. Yeah it must be SUPER COMMON in your community.
LOL.
ROTFLMAO. This is their "marketing"
https://peakd.com/@leoglossary
This did more harm to Hive and Leo.