there can always be a way out is just that authors at some point would want to misuse any opportunity to publishing posts that may not worth a certain reward.
majority that are present here on Hive are for the reward, there is no two ways about it. If hive decides not to reward contents so many people would leave and that's a fact.
I believe hive is bigger and better where so many changes can be put in place that can enable more income and reward to showcase through making contents and investing as well
It would suck and drive authors away.
So how can front-ends better incentivise stakeholders to upvote quality content instead?
How can front-ends tie the quality of content published with the value of a token?
there can always be a way out is just that authors at some point would want to misuse any opportunity to publishing posts that may not worth a certain reward.
But if there's no correlation between content and the value of the token, why does it matter?
majority that are present here on Hive are for the reward, there is no two ways about it. If hive decides not to reward contents so many people would leave and that's a fact.
I believe hive is bigger and better where so many changes can be put in place that can enable more income and reward to showcase through making contents and investing as well
What specific changes would tie the value of a token to the quality of content?
Thus encouraging stakeholders to vote quality content and not just for other investors.
maybe a bot may help lol.
Do you think if a front-end placed ads on content, it would generate revenue that could be used to generate buy demand for a layer-2 token?
Could this be a way to incentivise stakeholders of that layer-2 token to vote for quality?