Well the reason burning is more attractive is because in my opinion cryptocurrency still hasn't effectively proven itself outside of a pyramid.. ponzi like scheme for the most part. Not in every case but alot of the market is driven primarily on price gains.. That's almost the total motivation over use. When you have that .. that generally signifies you need that because you don't really have the value to support the price. So inflationary projects will mostly expediate the negative outcome of over inflating a crypto. So then in that case burning could only be a good thing. Now i do agree the simple mathematics of reducing supply is a very basic approach to a complex problem. However inflationary projects more often than not will destroy a project provided they have very little numbers or growth. If you really wanna have a slow network make it a membership site or one based primarily on money. Unfortunately in crypto the go to position is money over use. So when prices drop networks seem to take a drop as well. So in the cases you have that burning would have to offset that to a degree.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta