Yes i understand what you saying that different allied forces were there. The issue with all that then is okay if let's say australia was there and canada and germany and maybe even france. I think it's safe to assume they would all be in some agreement together. There would be one supreme command and everyone probably would agree to be under that. That sounds organized you wouldn't want everyone doing operations at once because that could cause mass confusion.
So then if everyone is there wouldn't that be a joint effort? I would imagine that would even be better and the operation would go more smooth. the next part is i have to assume the us govt would be in charge of everyone. So if the operation is not successful everything is under the direction of the us govt every other western nation. Okay that's fine that sounds like it would probably work that way.
Once the us govt decides to pull out under whatever date they agree. it's 2 individual forces now or more in the fray. The first is the afghani government and as a sovereign nation. Like for example the us govt only mission was to get bin laden not annex afghanistan. So if we tore up something in the process we should fix it.. but government building should have never been our direction. if we didn't like the taliban for protecting bin laden that was still up to the afghani people after we got bin laden if they wanted that government or not. that wasn't up to us to decide that.
So my understanding was that biden asked the afghani government were they ready to fight.. what did they want us to do next. according to joe biden the afghani government would always assure the us government they were ready to fight. now what i'm trying to figure out. is at what point does the afghan govt get to decide when they ready to fight on their own. .when they ready to run their own govt. or do we the united states decide that? if the country themselves were saying we fine.. i know the people weren't saying that but all i'm saying is at some point we have to let the country itself decide its destiny. Not everyone in afghanistan wanted the united states there in fact i think many didn't want the us govt there. So what right we have to keep making policy for the afghanis.
Now going back to the other forces that were there the international community. They got all this criticism where i'm confused is okay if those armies were there. United States leaving did they have any policy in place on how to deal with afghanistan seeing that the united states says they taking their hands off the ball?
What were the other nations policies on afghanistan? What is it now? Do they have one? Do they have a strategy or a future mission into afghanistan. It would seem that world safety and injustice and whatever forms of barbarianism may exist around the world. Does it have to be the united states and if the united states does'nt do anything. I mean the united states is one advanced civilization in the entire world.
Other nations quickly remind america you're not the only advanced nation and they are right. What i'm trying to say is the world doesn't have to just follow or wait on the united states to fix a problem. My assumption is other nations went to afghanistan because whatever reason the united states said they were going were in their best interest to go. So does that interest go away because the united states leaves? Why do they need teh united states in there? If they don't need the united states then again any criticism can happen after the afghanis have their country secure. Anybody can be blamed then. I don't think its a reason for the world to sit back and watch pandemonium because they felt the united states acted irresponsibly does that make sense?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta