Not too long ago—about a month ago—I started receiving a series of downvotes from a whale's account. Every single post I made for a week was downvoted by around $8 ±, and I was baffled as to why I was being targeted. The account responsible for the downvotes never posts or even comments. I didn’t reach out to them because I assumed they wouldn’t bother replying, given that they seemed like a silent account.
I try to not complain on here anymore because it's just tiresome and nothing ever changes. But the weirdest thing to me is how appreciator almost daily will upvote people that barely have 500 HP and have almost never curated other people. Even now there are people on here that have less HP than I do and still make $30 per post despite having made 60k HP historically. They almost never get that downvote to adjust rewards. Funnily I received a few downvotes from an account the other month because of my HP held yet none of these actual extractors are ever targeted.
There are two or three accounts (that I know of) that downvote posts that get what they'd consider a bit too high rewards under the argument of distributing the pending reward pool a little more. Again, they never appear on the people that probably do deserve it more than others. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
There's a problem with Hive that some people consider others to be making too much as well, it's a bit of an odd concept and stops Hive from being to really grow and attract different types of creatives though. Can't say I have a solution to that, but the idea of there being too high rewards for some is a bit of a platform restriction. And at the same time, I would even argue that there are people that make too much on here already and it doesn't trickle down.
It's all a bit messy given there's never really a fair way of going about any of this. If I were you I'd just keep doing your thing, if someone believes your posts are over-rewarded, let them deal with it and don't bother downvoting your own stuff. Maybe even point them towards the people that are making $30 per post while having 500 HP in their accounts. It probably won't lead to anything, but whatever.
The same reason why I feel that complaining or starting a debate about it will be a waste of my time and energy 😔.
I agree. Seems selective and inconsistent. Maybe they have a good reason for this? Like they don't want to drive too many people away? 😁.
There's a counter argument to this... I've seen in a recent DV debate started by another Hive user who has way more stake than me.
Hmm, I wonder why I agree to almost everything that you said, including this. Maybe it's obvious or their's truth to it. I'm not yet sure, need to back that claim with data or proof.
Personally, it seems about right.
Yeah, agree 💯. Thanks 🙏
Yeah, there's parts of the downvoting concept that I can understand and even agree with, it's just orchestrated in such a poor manner. Take into consideration this person of who I won't publicly name:
In the last 30 days, they've made $313 (1,125.49 HP). Their entire curation earnings (as in all time) are a simple 126 HP. Somehow this person never gets any unwanted attention for their endless Hive selling and next to nonexistent curation of other people's posts. Yet every post they make gets that appreciator vote. An average of $20 (daily) per post, and sometimes higher.
Whales shouldn't be downvoting your posts to redistribute the reward pool, they should be downvoting people like that.
There are many cases like this too, and some are worse off. Some people with 70k HP in historical earnings yet they only hold 2k and never stop powering down.
I agree though, it's a big waste of time. Over the years I've grown to just shut up and do my own thing, I can't be bothered with wasting my time arguing with people. But sometimes, situations like these really get me worked up haha, hard to not want to voice those frustrations.
Anyway, I don't think the downvotes you're seeing are whales disagreeing with your posts. I think they're just doing the usual reward pool redistribution work. It happens to a lot of people that get a post that sees high rewards. Sometimes more common for certain people that see higher rewards than others. I understand the purpose, but yeah if the focus shifted towards the right people more it'd be more effective.
Once again, I find myself agreeing because it's obvious.
Sometimes, it feels like they're just picking someone at random, hoping it will solve an issue they've been struggling with for years. Or maybe they're simply trying to mitigate the "situation" by choosing someone who isn’t connected to them… Hmm, that does sound like a conspiracy theory, though. I don’t have any evidence to back it up—just a hunch.
To be honest, I don’t have a solution either. So I can’t really blame them for why things aren’t improving, despite their attempts to "fix" it.
That said, I still come across meaningful interactions like this from time to time, and for me, that matters more than the rewards I receive. That’s why I’m still here. 😁
The reward pool side of things is just them going through the top posts of the day and hitting a few of them, nothing particularly select and not personal. Again they definitely miss some of the people that deserve it more, and aren't looking at historical rewards/held HP to make those decisions.
There's definitely a tiny bit of that too. There are curators of numerous curation guilds on here that have less HP than me, have made 70k historically, but still make $30 a post and are never hit with a downvote. Yet those curators will choose who to curate based on their engagement. "Rules for thee but not for me" kinda treatment. Not necessarily a huge conspiracy, just nobody really paying attention. I know this because I was part of one of those curation guilds for a few years.
Your comment is upvoted by @topcomment
Info - Support - Discord