Great to see you back again.
Just be careful with AI content to reference if your using it to generate articles as there is a debate right now about how legitimate it is for authors passing it off as their own work.
Fun times.
Great to see you back again.
Just be careful with AI content to reference if your using it to generate articles as there is a debate right now about how legitimate it is for authors passing it off as their own work.
Fun times.
I don't see the issue. If I can give chatgpt the same talking points and improve it in a few moments, the stuff is still original.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Doesn't bother me, just giving you a heads up.
The argument is that it's plagiarism as the computer wrote it and the author is passing it off as original content. If there is a reference to the chatbot it's grand.
I can see their point but i think that it's a losing battle now that people have started to use the technology. For me i think that it can't write with any personality but have no problem using it to prompt my writing to create content.
It's definitely a losing battle.
What if it can have a personality?
I mean, these are fast examples, with a bit of prompting work you can get as unique as your mind is.