If you have saved what the community gave you, since 2016, and the coin moons, perhaps you will be so busy with your newfound wealth that we can stop arguing over the rewards pool?
I bought in, and earned. I'm not arguing about a reward pool. Trying to figure out your 'business model' here. You're familiar with my work, correct? Actual writer. Actual artist. Entertainer at times. Right? When these 'types' of people in society become successful, do they quit? Not usually.
You seem to have touched on something akin to 'out with the old, in with the new.'
Now, I might be wrong here, because I'm rather confused by your words. Am I wrong to think you'd rather support new people, today? Which is totally fine, of course. But if that's the case, does your logic remain the same into the future? If so, are you explaining to 'the future', in a few years, they'll have no future, according to you?
My reference was to the fact that most of the people not of the class of 2016 have no idea what the fuss is all about.
What we have now is the normal, whereas those of us from 2016 have seen different parameters to nearly everything.
I liked hitting f5 and watching my hp balance go up, but that got nixed in hf16, then we did the bidbot thing with linear rewards, then we nixed that.
We replaced it with a poor tax because those that understood the math were also benefiting from it.
Now we got linear again, but only on day one, and all those not familiar with the curation reward curve have no idea that voting after day one pays some of the curation rewards to the earlier voters.
So, I'm not sure where you got the interpretation of what I said from, but I think what you think I said is clearly not the message I was sending.
The message I was trying to send was to get things finalized so that those of us that know the different scenarios with the pool can move on to something else to gripe about.
Like how the professional writers will be sucking up the pool and us lowlifes have to make do on the crumbs, or the like.
Lol, no, not taking a shot at you, personally.
You may be a member of a class I am taking shots at, but it's not about you as a person, nor individual.
That would require that I take time to think about you as an individual.
Now, if you feel you are a member of a class I do take a shot at, I can't control what you think, nor how you feel.
Again, the moving on was a reference to putting these complaints about how the pool is distributed to rest.
Yes, you would qualify.
I'd qualify as someone without a future here? Am I reading you correctly?
If you have saved what the community gave you, since 2016, and the coin moons, perhaps you will be so busy with your newfound wealth that we can stop arguing over the rewards pool?
It is possible that I will be.
I bought in, and earned. I'm not arguing about a reward pool. Trying to figure out your 'business model' here. You're familiar with my work, correct? Actual writer. Actual artist. Entertainer at times. Right? When these 'types' of people in society become successful, do they quit? Not usually.
You seem to have touched on something akin to 'out with the old, in with the new.'
Now, I might be wrong here, because I'm rather confused by your words. Am I wrong to think you'd rather support new people, today? Which is totally fine, of course. But if that's the case, does your logic remain the same into the future? If so, are you explaining to 'the future', in a few years, they'll have no future, according to you?
I'm confused by this. Could you please clarify.
My reference was to the fact that most of the people not of the class of 2016 have no idea what the fuss is all about.
What we have now is the normal, whereas those of us from 2016 have seen different parameters to nearly everything.
I liked hitting f5 and watching my hp balance go up, but that got nixed in hf16, then we did the bidbot thing with linear rewards, then we nixed that.
We replaced it with a poor tax because those that understood the math were also benefiting from it.
Now we got linear again, but only on day one, and all those not familiar with the curation reward curve have no idea that voting after day one pays some of the curation rewards to the earlier voters.
So, I'm not sure where you got the interpretation of what I said from, but I think what you think I said is clearly not the message I was sending.
The message I was trying to send was to get things finalized so that those of us that know the different scenarios with the pool can move on to something else to gripe about.
Like how the professional writers will be sucking up the pool and us lowlifes have to make do on the crumbs, or the like.
Like I said. I was confused. It looked like you were saying:
As if I've done something wrong and you'll feel lucky/good to see me go.
And I didn't know how to process that.
I'm confused again. This time I'll just be straight forward and ask directly. Are you taking a shot at me?
Lol, no, not taking a shot at you, personally.
You may be a member of a class I am taking shots at, but it's not about you as a person, nor individual.
That would require that I take time to think about you as an individual.
Now, if you feel you are a member of a class I do take a shot at, I can't control what you think, nor how you feel.
Again, the moving on was a reference to putting these complaints about how the pool is distributed to rest.