Poor people aren't everyday people? When you pit normal against rich, that means it's rich against not rich and the poor are part of the not rich category, right? Normal and everyday people is simply way too broad for a point to be made.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Poor people are a part of everyday people, but not all everyday people are poor.
Exactly, I agree and each category of everyday people have different means for decorating their abodes, so have to be broken up further into subcategories for there to be any real meaning.
trashy->tasteless->tacky->tasteful->whimsical->bespoke
ghetto, below poverty level, lower middle class, middle class, upper middle class, white collar
Interesting cutoff 😆
ok, I should have added an 'etc.'
I'm giving you a B+ 👨🏻🏫
I would say ghetto is more of a state of mind rather than an economic descriptor
I was using it as the homeless with zero income or a home, though many more fit, but it was just to make a point. I don't have the want nor patience to go into more detail than I did and it isn't necessary to get the point across, correct?