Band 1 isn't a show, budgets for TV are set in bands, Band 1, 2 , 3 etc. Band 1 is the lowest. It helps when offering pay rates to crew etc. I'm a bit sad that you're advocating thousands of people losing their jobs to be honest not that I think it will happen.
Nobody is making any commercial content on smartphones beyond youtube,
In terms of AI, its soulless, is there any Ai art thats selling for millions?
Taskmaster mentions the Superbowl in the video and yes alternative commentary and analysis is welcome (and already exists) but without the insight and expertise it's worthless. I love rugby but there is only 1 maybe 2 analysts on youtube that really add any value.
From my perspective niche interests will be catered for but it wont be Hank down the road making high value content it will still be experts in their field producing content.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm not advocating anything. I'm just stating how things are. A lot of artists and programmers have already lost their jobs to Generative AI.
I agree that AI art is soulless, but do your research before making sweeping statements like these. A simple google search showed multiple results. https://motioncue.com/best-movies-shot-on-smartphones/ Some movies there even won awards.
Ok fair enough, I guess I'd just watched the video when I commented and the guy in the video seems to be projecting some hope about the disruption based on his own biases. Ironically making a video on a smartphone by the look of it against a flat background with zero visdual interest. If i had to guess I'd say he has an axe to grind because he never got a job in production but of course I'm probably way off the mark.
Interesting that the image you uploaded shows examples of AI art that hasn't sold for millions, no.13 being 4 pieces that sold for a combined 1.1 mil. Crypto bros may be paying this for computer generated art, I don't see serious collectors buying this stuff, its ape jpegs all over again. Humans are stupid though, people pay 10's of thousands for handbags ffs.
Interesting link re smart phone films, Soderbergh is definitely an established filmmaker, he knows the game, is very skilled and he's experimenting, tell him tomorrow that he's only to make films on smartphones in future and he'd have a fit. Searching for Sugarman is great but I've not heard of the rest. Film festival accolades are sometimes a bit meh, I've sat through so much utter shit at a couple of film festivals you just want to vote for something by the end so you can get to the bar. A member of my family used to curate a festival and the voting is, um, biased at best, corrupt at worst.
I interpreted your millions not as a single purchase, but as a whole. The fact that the transactions are reaching millions shows there is a market. You not liking them doesn't change anything.
You said smartphone films were only for YT, and I showed you multiple examples. Your comments about film festivals and awards are just your opinion and doesn't change the fact that they were appreciated by a group of people over other works.
Absolutely my opinion, what you may not realise about film festivals is that lots of the films are self submitted, i.e. the producers submit their own work and the festivals want to fill screen time outside of the one or two featured films that they have brought in with maybe a retrospective of a famous artists work thrown in for good measure. Go to some festivals, you'll see some of the crap on offer. Anyway, lets agree to disagree, films made on phones aren't going to majorly disrupt the film business with the exception of a few that will hit the sweet spot with an amazing script, skilled technicians who understand the constraints of shooting on a phone.
Unsane - one of the Soderbergh films in the article you posted had over a 100 crew members, Olive - 50 ish crew members plus many more not on the IMDB page for the movie, this is not some guy or girl working out of their parents back bedroom with nothing but an iphone and some bright ideas.
I have faith that humanity will not hand over the joy of art and the human condition to the machines, we may do for the lowest common denominator stuff but that about it.
Absolutely my opinion, what you may not realise about film festivals is that lots of the films are self submitted, i.e. the producers submit their own work and the festivals want to fill screen time outside of the one or two featured films that they have brought in with maybe a retrospective of a famous artists work thrown in for good measure. Go to some festivals, you'll see some of the crap on offer. Anyway, lets agree to disagree, films made on phones aren't going to majorly disrupt the film business with the exception of a few that will hit the sweet spot with an amazing script, skilled technicians who understand the constraints of shooting on a phone.
Unsane - one of the Soderbergh films in the article you posted had over a 100 crew members, Olive - 50 ish crew members plus many more not on the IMDB page for the movie, this is not some guy or girl working out of their parents back bedroom with nothing but an iphone and some bright ideas.
I have faith that humanity will not hand over the joy of art and the human condition to the machines, we may do for the lowest common denominator stuff but that about it.