This argument about the first blood I've heard it before... but just ignores the fact that JS announced first that he would migrate STEEM into TRON without consulting anyone in STEEM. He acted like the owner of the blockchain and the community there, blocking accounts, censoring people.
I get it though, just because you didn't get banned and doesn't affect you directly you support JS's attack as something natural. But think it twice how the STEEM witnesses could allow that?, the response was logical and NOT the alleged FIRST BLOOD.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Ok, so Justin's high level plan was to add STEEM to the TRON ecosystem and at the thought of losing some sort of control the Witnesses thought they were clever by trying to block Justin out of a ton of coins he just purchased. Right there is where the Witnesses stepped over the line and thought they were boss.
It's not surprising he took extreme actions and things got nasty. Then I think it is ridiculous that certain users were excluded from their HIVE stake but then that was said to be valid because HIVE is a fork of the original STEEM so it isn't the same as Justin blocking out people's stake.
The fight should have never happened.
I don't really support Justin's actions. But if I get punched in the face don't be surprised if my retaliation lands the aggressor in the hospital.
The Witnesses have no clue what Justin had in store for STEEM. He was just trying to add to his associated acquisitions.
And what are we left with? A similar STEEM that we had with TRON rewards on top. Again the fight should have never happened and the whole ecosystem as a whole would be stronger if the war didn't occur.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta