You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: NO Financial Security in POB Investment

in LeoFinance4 years ago

It's ironic this post now won't be appearing on POB, which is where it needs to be seen the most!

My impressions are that it's a cliquey place consisting of your inner circle (jerk) and then a lot of 'cap doffers' angling for votes.

There are a few decent people I know who have made pretty significant investments in POB - @scholaris might want to read this, if he picks up tags or not I don't know!

Of course the person's reaction we're all really interested in is 1A's ;- he could half the token price in a month if he decided to get out!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

Hello and good evening. Thank you very much for the mention. I was fascinated by one of Azircon's earlier posts regarding research into POB. I was awaiting the results of his requested analyses as a means to determine several courses of action (i.e., stay, leave, work to changes things, etc.).

I am currently undecided for a couple of reasons. The first is the presentation of data. I felt that what was presented is accurate. I'm familiar with some of Azircon's posts on PLG and the handling of fraud from his articles. If, through his evaluation, he deemed the tables he displayed accurate, I believe it. After all, it must be reproducable. He has the resources.

What I'm concerned about is the interpretation. I'm not as experienced as some on the blockchain. I would have expected to see an equivalent comparison between, let's say, POB and HIVE. Here's a list of POB stakeholders and a list of equivalent HIVE or tribe stakeholders. "This is the kind of distribution we feel is valid." That would probably have sealed the deal for me.

Then there are other things too. Things I don't know about. This thing between Azircon, Lucylin, and POB on the surface appears just toxic. The conversation between him and whatsup in the comments? What was that about? I thought constructive questions were raised. Only rewards distribution and evidence of legal voting are displayed. My personal investment choice in POB is now in a gray area because of Azircon (which is good), but at this time it isn't enough to change.

I always liked Leo Finance, you know? That's a legit group. Only finance. That's the way they like it. Khal...Jesus, always on the move. I'm a little sad about not being there often because that's a good crew. The Leo tribe takes care of their own. I also remember reading your earlier posts revise. You wanted to break out. Build your own life and livelihood. You post about it still! I love the level of detail and interaction you bring in your progress.

That's how I feel about POB. At POB, I feel like I can help build something great. Everyone has a positive attitude, but also quite the negative one at times. Almost like a family. Disputes get resolved, and people move on. A few people become enraged at the DV, almost like a Spanish novella. Apparently that's a thing. Markymark or other veterans, at times, jumps into discord and joke around, maybe smack us around a little bit because we need to improve and we're not meeting their expectations. They give great lessons. They speak, we listen, and we learn. Slowly but surely, we improve on our content and engagement.

In summary: Azircon's concerns warrant evaluating changes in behaviors. Data presentation is inconclusive.

However, if it doesn't look good, THEN it might not be good. Right? That approaches regulatory space. You don't mess with that. Fortunately, at least concerning delegations, behaviors started changing this past Sunday with Calumam's change in delegations. I don't think he has any more pending evaluation on how to move forward. I don't know what the final plan is, but they want to meet expectations. They want to align, and I will support them.

Thanks again for the mention Revise. Have a great evening.

Ah you do check your tags I was wondering! I think the Tribes are a great opportunity for people to have a bigger footprint, which I know from LEO feels great, my main reservation with POB is that I'm not 100% sure whose behind it, at least with LEO I can put a face to the project, someone whose prepared to put their actual identity on the line!

I was thinking some comparative data with Hive would be good too - I'm sure there is something out there already that tells us this, I'll dig around, but I've spent way too long on here this a.m. already!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I concur wholeheartedly with your assessment. It’s always great to know at least the person leading the tribe.

The only reason I was less patient with whatup is because there is a history there. Whatsup was extremely bashful to hive when we separated and kept the opinions that large stakeholders are bad and here to exploit small stakeholders. This is a lie.

Also, although whatsup been around for a long time she fail the grasp the fundamental and philosophical aspects of DPOS. I have tried a lot of explanation to this crowd and ran out of patience....

99E7EFE5-ACAD-4A1C-B0D5-5E075A1CD1E0.png

However since I have not tried this detail with you, if time permits I am willing to try with you.

We haven't interacted before this week and you keep misrepresenting my position.

Funny, I never interacted with either Donald Trump or Joe Biden; yet I can interpret their position very well :)

Am I communicating here?