This is so relevant as we advance. GPT-3 is an incredible achievement but a huge risk to Hive regarding verifying and rewarding authentic human content. Personally, if I read factual articles, I want to see references and sources stated because people don't just know these things intrinsically. I also look for changes in writing technique, tone, ability etc between the core of the posts and the comment section. If they don't gel, I suspect plagiarism or AI involvement. Some tools (Google plugins like "GPTrue or False") are available already to check for GPT-2 AI involvement and are said to be pretty accurate at identifying GPT-2 derived content. Let's hope that they get a GPT-3 checker plugin soon. I just found this one online but it comes at a PAYG cost of $0.1 per 100words. Originality.ai
I don't have an issue if someone states at the outset that the first part of their article is AI-generated to set the scene for their own commentary etc, because then I can reward the post based on the commentary alone. But if I discovered that someone was using AI to write any of their posts, not declaring it and profiting from it, I would stop supporting them. Because I want to engage with real people here on Hive. I want to know what real people think of socio-political issues, the humanities, philosophy, and the economy. I want to feel what they feel when writing fiction, poetry, and creating artwork. I came to Hive to write and to connect with people... not with bots. Great article - thank you for sharing. !PIZZA !ALIVE
@itsostylish @dreemsteem
You Are Alive so I just staked 0.1 $ALIVE(2/10)@taskmaster4450! to your account on behalf of @samsmith1971.
The tip has been paid for by the We Are Alive Tribe
through the earnings on @alive.chat, feel free to swing by our daily chat any time you want.