That's not an uncommondust-collecting service. 🤓 preference for maximizing author/curator rewards, especially by Hive users who use neither the #dustsweeper or #dustbunny
!WINEX !LUV
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That's not an uncommondust-collecting service. 🤓 preference for maximizing author/curator rewards, especially by Hive users who use neither the #dustsweeper or #dustbunny
!WINEX !LUV
Absolutely right I think that's better
If the curator can vote significantly above $0.02 per vote, then he or she is free to vote on comments instead of posts without losing the value of the votes to dust. 🤓
!WEED !BEER
Oh ok that's pretty nice one brother... I'm close to that point so perhaps I might start the dust sweeper stuff
sweep again most (if not all) incoming and/or outgoing dust votes of all users of its service (given enough credit balance of each user). 🤓 The dustsweeper bot not sweeping dustMaybe use the #dustsweeper service only if it is able to properly is the reason why @savvyplayer withdrew their Hive Power delegation from me. 🤯
You might want to use the #dustbunny service instead, where you just need to delegate Hive Power instead of sending HIVE periodically. 😏
!LOLZ !LUV
lolztoken.com
Nothing at all. It's juiceless.
Credit: reddit
$LOLZ on behalf of savvytester
(2/10)
NEW: Join LOLZ's Daily Earn and Burn Contest and win $LOLZ@theringmaster, I sent you an
When the time Comes I'll do so dear friend
Having your incoming (and also outgoing) dust votes swept or fluffed would help make your Hive account grow faster. 🤓😎
!PIZZA !WINEX
Thanks brother Thanks a lot