I've been watching videos on YouTube about the true meaning of "turn the other cheek". Apparently, there is 1st century cultural context to it, which means putting yourself on the same level as the aggressor rather than an inferior-superior confrontation. In fact, the gospels mention that the Apostles carried swords. Furthermore, Jesus did not turn the other cheek when He was struck. So, it's not a call to being harmless. Rather, it's about being wise in fighting injustice to make others realize they are acting wrongly. The teaching as a form of nonviolent resistance, not passive submission.
When I read them many years ago, I never caught those details and points you noted. It's a good reason (among others) to re-read those Gospels and see for ourselves those points in writing. We need more "Holy cow!" moments in our studies.
I think part of the misunderstanding is that the Gospels were written for contemporary audiences who understood the cultures of that time. They took for granted that readers would understand the meanings of certain actions. Over time and space, the cultural significance of certain things gets lost. We no longer live according to Roman customs. Thus we don't understand the significance of being struck on the right and turning your left.
so…trolling with love?! 😍
Oddly, that sounds about right.
The Catholic view emphasizes addressing the evil or injustice rather than satisfying vengeance or a personal vendetta. Instead, one must tackle systemic wrongs with patience and moral clarity, not personal spite.