Agreed. The term and ones like it sexualizing networking or network effects or the use of ones own stake as you see fit are ignorant, crude and inappropriate. Decentralization and self sovereignty aren’t defined by anyone’s whims or beliefs. They are clearly defined and can’t be conveniently ignored when someone disagrees with what people write or who they vote for. That’s what freedom is about. People say they support freedom, but do they really, or do they only support people exercising self sovereignty when they agree with what’s said or who is supported. I think the later, and that’s a bigger problem then all the issues the censorship is suppose to fix. .
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: