I didn’t see this before: “.. because a service is literally paying people to not look.”
But now I do.
I think your right to say that because delegation relieves you of the need to curate, so why look at posts anymore, and if your stake is delegated, why vote.
Interesting.
We always learn something new, when we allow ourselves to see through the eyes of another.
This one is funny, but true, it explains the absentee landlord phenomenon. ”.. Folks talk about the importance of retention and in the same breath offer them ways to get paid to not be around.
Yep, they are not here minding their delegated stake, and seeing what people do with it.
The same could be said for stake parked on exchanges, and used to vote by exchanges.
The more you look, the more you see, and wonder why.
Oh well.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Many of these situations where someone is dangling easy money over ones head in my view seem like cutting one end of the rope off, tying it to the other end, then convincing people the rope is longer; but really the rope has only become weaker. Nobody notices because money good.
Blah. Back to sitting back and watching.