My point was I don't need anyone but doing the walled garden approach is failing.
This is why microsoft / wotc etc.. are more interested in a fork then buying up Hive.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My point was I don't need anyone but doing the walled garden approach is failing.
This is why microsoft / wotc etc.. are more interested in a fork then buying up Hive.
Right... yes, I agree that pretty much all the business models that currently exist on Hive are quite incorrect and not within the spirit of open-source decentralization. This answers the question pretty well because I've run into this issue a couple times in my adventures.
I think this is the point i was trying to make.
I am trying to change the business model and onboard large outside capital and everyone is just like "here is the repo" "good luck"
when I have a ton of other things I am building.
Even when i say hey can you spare an hour to look at a few lines of code, the "large share-holders" go.... Nope.
I don't have time for that.
Really? You want the price to go and be a good investment option but you will not advise? or review a line of code?
That is fine, just disheartening.
It's like why build value for a chain with that viewpoint.
Not saying I can't do it, just would be faster with a bit more back and forth.
That is why I thought a DHF funded team would be amazing for onboarding.
Quite right.
Yeah I get it now it's just never not been like this so many are numb to the BS.