privately owned? when they were just an arm of the government? censoring communication?
Not sure I agree.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
privately owned? when they were just an arm of the government? censoring communication?
Not sure I agree.
I just don't get why we think Twitter has any sort of mandate to allow people to promote hate speech that will attract the attention of the government where they're based (your US of A).
They don't.
They are there to make money and not get anyone working at the company arrested.
Of course they will continue to ban loonie bins like that guy.
His Sandy Hook shit has just blown over, but there will be many more like him booted in the future.