20% yield mathematically is unsustainable unless you run a ponzi with massive user growth to channel in new money. Even so at some point it has to stop, or devalue against other assets, thus lowering the real return to a number that is more in line with the market
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah I bet that sounds totally correct until we take into account that Bitcoin has been making 100% gains year over year since 2013. And before 2013 it performed even better than that. Obviously 20% is completely sustainable given the correct incentives, and the yield that was offered by UST had absolutely nothing to do with the crash.