We have heard a bit about delegating miner tokens. It’s interesting to us.
If can delegate it allows for pools to build and the delegator to earn. But it does not result in as much liquidity in the defi pool (SIP). So it’s a trade off we are looking into.
The nodes will be free to down load and a package that allow u to run infrastructure with little hard ware and I would assume clusters will naturally form from this to share hardware costs. This makes a lot of sense and is something we should definitely explore more.
The mining pool backed by tokens is essentially what the SIP is.
The more I read what u are describing the more I think what u are describing is more or less what we are building.
Boring is very good. Very very very very very very good
ok sounds nice :D
Yeah I mean maybe some " whitepaper for dummies" with pictures could help people like me.
Some really simple. Like the books for children, a farm gets explained.
" that's a cow" and so on :P
Boring and steady is good :P Boring alone not that much :D
There were a lot of pictures done buy ryzeonline. Some of them are on the SPK.network website front page. We can get. The rest put up as a link on the site too.
Btw, Cluster + SIB liquidity could also work with liquidity that allows staking into a cluster.
For example.
Like a tree root system. People can stake into the tree. So they can be part of that, but no power down.
The same for hardware, you can add to the cluster (root system).
It would be an independent cluster that has mining rewards by nature that would create edge point hardware to join it.
It would allow more people get involved in that system IMO :)
And would decentralize everything a bit more, because if many clusters + Single players are in the field would democratize it massively.
There must be a way people can store $ and help the network, or invest. But without any know-how from technicals. That opens the door for huge $.
I’m pretty sure this is exactly what is being built. cluster will likely naturally form.
It would be interesting to see a post from u that give a few more details about this to make sure we are actually talking about the same thing.
I would recommend reading the documentation on the speak network too. There is plenty. Most is linked on our SPK.network website, our blog @spknetwork or our video blog segments on @spknetwork.chat
After that if u still think what u are proposing is completely different, then I’d love to see a short basic spec for it written out.
Maybe what u are proposing is a way to make it easier technically for SPK infrastructure nodes to for clusters and share rewards. The easier this can be made to take part in technically, especially for the smaller node operators, probably the better imo. So what u are proposing is likely something that can be either built into or on top of the SPK network protocol