I personally think it's a bit of an overreach from the SEC. On what basis are they trying to define and control these assets, to protect users they may say. But I think it's more than that. I hope the case becomes dismissed :)
I personally think it's a bit of an overreach from the SEC. On what basis are they trying to define and control these assets, to protect users they may say. But I think it's more than that. I hope the case becomes dismissed :)
I as well tink it is an over reach from them. I am not sure of the reason why tho. It is fairly clear they do not want any new laws or rules to be made as they repeatedly say the once that exist are enough. Despite them clearly not being fit for crypto.
Right. It's akin to fitting the old into the new when both are entirely different things!
Exactly, or the square peg in the triangle hole ^^