To be clear, the matters being discussed are censorship, centralization, targeted down-voting campaigns, and libel & slander being published by top witnesses.
Your post is responding to just my most recent post in this months-long conversation, without the context of the whole conversation. One post, which was designed simply to highlight a specific hypocrisy.
Whether intentional or not, you're being wildly deceptive. Based on all the veiled personal attacks, mis-representation, and double-think in your post, it reads as intentional.
There are five years worth of posts of mine you can go through if you want some background on this conversation you are part of for the last few months. Grab a drink and have a good read.
LOL. I meant very specific conversation, with mostly the same handful of people discussing it (of which you aren't one), for the last few months.
I've also been here since mid-2016, part of the conversation, giving my everything to Steem/Hive, because I was so under the illusion - or maybe just so bought into the dream of the possibility of what it could be/have been (if it wasn't a money-decides-everything shit-show)
That handful ( if who I think) seem to be pretty clueless about how things actually function. Perhaps you should have talked with people who understand a bit more.
Well, those were smooth, acidyo, azircon, ura-soul, truthforce, and notconvinced (them + me probably make up at least a third of the 900+ comments on my last 6 posts)
Since 4 of those folks are witnesses, 3 in the top 20, who would you recommend who "understands a bit more"
Understands what, exactly?
Nobody's confused about how Hive works - just debating about who is doing what, who isn't, what would be better, etc.
Oh btw, you go back for those five years, you will find very specific conversations around these topics with some of those same people and dozens more. You aren't bringing anything new to the table from what I have seen, and that last post of yours showed how little you actually seem to understand or research - or perhaps you position yourself this way on purpose - I don't know.
Oh btw, you go back for those five years, you will find very specific conversations around these topics with some of those same people and dozens more.
Cool, once again I can say the same.
You aren't bringing anything new to the table from what I have seen
Well, you clearly haven't read most of the recent posts or conversations on the subject, so...
that last post of yours showed how little you actually seem to understand or research
Well, since you completely misunderstood what my last post was about...
(or are simply intentionally misrepresenting me, not 100% sure which...)
900 comments - you are finally getting some engagement, good for you!
Pretty sure Smooth, Acid and Azircon are in disagreement with your opinions on downvoting. At least you can learn something from them, I recommend paying attention - but will you?
So you're definitely just going to ignore the actual conversation, and literally just appeal to authority in this case, eh?
Thanks for helping bring exposure to the conversation, even if you aren't going to get involved yourself, and are actively tricking people into ignoring what's actually going on by intentionally mis-framing and mis-representing things.
To be clear, the matters being discussed are censorship, centralization, targeted down-voting campaigns, and libel & slander being published by top witnesses.
Your post is responding to just my most recent post in this months-long conversation, without the context of the whole conversation. One post, which was designed simply to highlight a specific hypocrisy.
Whether intentional or not, you're being wildly deceptive. Based on all the veiled personal attacks, mis-representation, and double-think in your post, it reads as intentional.
There are five years worth of posts of mine you can go through if you want some background on this conversation you are part of for the last few months. Grab a drink and have a good read.
LOL. I meant very specific conversation, with mostly the same handful of people discussing it (of which you aren't one), for the last few months.
I've also been here since mid-2016, part of the conversation, giving my everything to Steem/Hive, because I was so under the illusion - or maybe just so bought into the dream of the possibility of what it could be/have been (if it wasn't a money-decides-everything shit-show)
That handful ( if who I think) seem to be pretty clueless about how things actually function. Perhaps you should have talked with people who understand a bit more.
Well, those were smooth, acidyo, azircon, ura-soul, truthforce, and notconvinced (them + me probably make up at least a third of the 900+ comments on my last 6 posts)
Since 4 of those folks are witnesses, 3 in the top 20, who would you recommend who "understands a bit more"
Understands what, exactly?
Nobody's confused about how Hive works - just debating about who is doing what, who isn't, what would be better, etc.
Oh btw, you go back for those five years, you will find very specific conversations around these topics with some of those same people and dozens more. You aren't bringing anything new to the table from what I have seen, and that last post of yours showed how little you actually seem to understand or research - or perhaps you position yourself this way on purpose - I don't know.
Cool, once again I can say the same.
Well, you clearly haven't read most of the recent posts or conversations on the subject, so...
Well, since you completely misunderstood what my last post was about...
(or are simply intentionally misrepresenting me, not 100% sure which...)
900 comments - you are finally getting some engagement, good for you!
Pretty sure Smooth, Acid and Azircon are in disagreement with your opinions on downvoting. At least you can learn something from them, I recommend paying attention - but will you?
So you're definitely just going to ignore the actual conversation, and literally just appeal to authority in this case, eh?
Thanks for helping bring exposure to the conversation, even if you aren't going to get involved yourself, and are actively tricking people into ignoring what's actually going on by intentionally mis-framing and mis-representing things.