You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: How do you value Human vs AI content?

in LeoFinance2 years ago

Sure proof of human is still the main factor for the value of art, but until what stage.

I am not certain. But, once it is no longer needed, we are lost as a species. All of us become irrelevant immediately. This might be what we deserve of course :)

Would we hit this point in which every art will have to become a performance art? That would be the way to have that proof of human.

I suspect more and more this will be the case.

Sort:  

Poor writers. They will need to spice up their writing game. I don't know how but making it a show will be in demand.

I am not certain. But, once it is no longer needed, we are lost as a species. All of us become irrelevant immediately. This might be what we deserve of course :)

Well, it seems our duty is to become wires. Or that was what I saw in some AI-generated art.

I don't know how but making it a show will be in demand.

Starting with a personality I guess. People are people, they are not their content - yet many think that is all it takes.

Sure. That is until we become redundant.

:D :D

Exactly. But think of it this way - is it better to be redundant with a personality, or without? Sure, we might not make much money, but we will do well down at the pub ;D

😂😂😂

Well, that's certainly an interesting point. Maybe it will be like this run of the X-Men where humans have fuses with machines and are on the verge of assimilation by an interstellar conglomerate race called the Phalanx. So it might not even be a point in pubs. 😂