I think we have seen what overrewarding shill turns into. Leo content should be rewarded because it is Leo content, it should be rewarded if it adds value to the platform, discussion and user base. For wider adoption, good non-Leo content should be rewarded and shared.
The odd shill is fine, but with the token value so high (great) and some curators focusing on Leo content heavily, there is a dilution of quality, but it is still getting rewarded heavily, because it has Leo in the title. Curators should be a little more discerning than that and I hope they adjust so that value-adding content gets rewarded.
Everyone has a different idea of value of course.
Very well said. I agree - shilling is great in moderation (like most things). When it is done at the expense of other things, it becomes a problem.
In my opinion, the run in price and new users has caused a major focus on rewarding only content that mentions Leo. It’s fine to reward that content, but it’s not a great thing if that’s the only content receiving the rewards.
Rebalancing the incentives is extremely important. Support all good crypto/finance content when it benefits the platform.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta