Perhaps I am TOO bullish, but I feel that every time governments try to regulate crypto, they only push the market to come up with better solutions.
This is the dance, isn't it?
Their regulation versus the innovation of the techie/financial people. We know regulations exists to protect the incumbents. They use their power and might to influence the politicians, who are nothing more than puppets.
So the great race is on. Do they actually add more value each time they attack? Hard to tell. But whatever they do, it does seem there is a counter measure by the industry. Innovation, open source, and global development are impossible for one country, or even a few countries to stop.
Ultimately, as long as one allows it to take place, it will. This will cause it to spread.
As for your question, forking stable coins, if that can be done, it should be. The more that is out there before the regulators get going, the better.
We should create a million different tokens just so they exist. We can decide whether they are needed or not at a later date.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I don't think you can win against a HIVE mind especially when it continues to attract capital, now you're a HIVE mind of well-funded individuals and what seems to be is you feed it by attacking it you FUD capital into the strongest hands, and they form the base that converts the others and allocates the capital to the best solutions.
It's actually brilliant to watch it all take place in real-time. I agree, I mean we as HIVE users have a community with our own stable coin and we find ways to use it, I can't see why other communities won't do the same