Arguably the safest sustainable energy even though it is pretty costly is nuclear however I can also counter with the Chernobyl Fukushima Three Mile Island and Hanford.
I lived most of the past 30 years within 80 miles of a nuke plant. Built in the 1980s, solid is a rock, in a state nowhere near fault lines.
Honestly enough which would you rather have a big huge mining disaster, pumping for oil, dead eagles from wind turbine energy, or nuclear meltdown...
True non are good but when you look at the options, yes we have some nuke meltdowns. However, considering how many are in operation and for how long, not a bad ratio. Plus, the newer plants seem to be safer.
Smoke produces CO2 which plants breathe.
Dont say that. It ruins the boogeyman story.
from the batteries especially.
Here is the crux if the discussion. And how is this resolved. Because batteries are not only in EVs and it is not decreasing any time soon. The world is acquiring a larger thirst for batteries, EVs aside.
Naturally, they cant produce enough now to keep up with demand. So what is the solution. Obviously they are going to have to greatly improve to keep pace. Price is only one factor, and a secondary one when the production cant keep up.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta