Just start a pool of equal (or larger size) on BSC.
If there are 10 million HBD tied to the pHBD pool, then you are talking $20 million TVL. Duplicate that across 5 or 6 chains.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm completely in favor of this. Since there are many similarities with EVM chains, the process of relaunching on multiple blockchains should not be a daunting task.
!PIZZA
It isnt. Much of what is on Polycub will end up on Cubfinance and then other chains.
So we will see a bHBD token on BSC at some point. We still have a challenge with the HBD out there.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Not releasing all the features at once on all the chains does have the benefit of keeping the marketing buzz around. Imagine Having AvalancheCUB and FantomCUB released one after the other instead of both at once. It will be like time traveling onto familiar ground. We can rinse and repeat what has already worked with further improvements.
In fact these tough times are the best because it gets rid of the weak projects and allow us to be ready to release major developments once the markets start going up. POLYCUB even fell below $0.25 today. Markets are extremely irrational. I wish I had more liquid funds left. At least I have learned my lessons for launches on other blockchains.
!PIZZA
That is true. It also gives them time to add to the software and expand the features. You know those chains will have a HBD pool on them when they go live.
It wasnt the case a month ago.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
This type of adoption is extremely important. Most people default to using whatever that is easily available. If users get introduced to HBD and then learn about free transactions on HIVE, that is going to get more attention to HIVE. If we can have RC Delegation Pools ready when the masses come, we can get a lot of interest from cryptocurrency users/investors who have been ignoring us for a long time.
!PIZZA