In my opinion, the final piece of the puzzle is the onramp and offramp to HBD.
Not even close but I get what you are saying. There are other layers to develop which are crucial for the resiliency of HBD.
One thing that needs to happen is to get the bHBD LP going on BSC as soon as possible. I get the hesitancy since the goal is to fill up the LP on Polygon. However, one of the keys is to get the derivatives of HBD going. This will add another layer to it. Even with minimal funding into the LP, we could see another path of arbitrage.
The trading volume with pHBD is up. We see something similar on the internal exchange. So while the external exchanges get the attention, these two are assuming a lot of volume.
Add in bHBD as soon as you can. That is another point of resiliency. Yes, we need the entry/exit points but we also have to get the other aspects going.
Hard to build all at once but that is what we must do.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
It goes back to modeling activities for HIVE, HBD, and CUB after what had been done with LEO: make it available across the popular blockchains (Ethereum, BSC, and now Polygon), then make transfer among these chains as painless as possible.
Until we can use local currency directly to buy cryptocurrencies we want (even HBD), we need to find ways to minimize activities at the on-ramps/off-ramps of centralized exchanges.
Other stablecoins can be used to get money out of centralized exchanges. After that, we can do everything else we need (including buying BTC/ETH/BNB/MATIC/etc.)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta