Only NFTs belonging to a game should have value, which are backed by some real-world object, which is backed by some real value, not just a photo xD
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Only NFTs belonging to a game should have value, which are backed by some real-world object, which is backed by some real value, not just a photo xD
It amazes me till date how some pictures are worth so much. I guess value is relative and it depends on the buyer. The whole idea behind NFTs still fascinates me.
I do not understand how someone pays so much money for an image that can simply copy and already, and when it is an asset in a game or the real world changes the value, but a jpg
🤣 till date, I do not understand as well. Not sure I will ever understand that as well.
😁