Paraphrasing could actually be done properly, and that's by giving credits to the source!
That’s the only time paraphrasing is legit.
Source not cited, it’s plagiarism.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Paraphrasing could actually be done properly, and that's by giving credits to the source!
That’s the only time paraphrasing is legit.
Source not cited, it’s plagiarism.
That's what I think as well, I really appreciate your time
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Sensible and good question from you...when you see those that genuinely want to stop any form of abuse you will know,they take their time to investigate issues and make their decisions based on strong evidence/proof...but those that have ulterior motive are always quick to jump into conclusions...just to get attention from some certain whales they start becoming desperate to do anything to get attention,even if it has to do with witch-hunting others... She knows what she is doing,trust me she is waiting for a particular whale to come online and give her that huge upvote which is the reason for the attention she is seeking....someday the whale will discover that she has been playing smart with him all along and her true intention is not what she potrays on this platform...
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Hold up, wait who doesn't want an upvote from a whale?
While writing or paraphrasing others articles, don't you hope a whale will upvote you?
Non of us would be here if money wasn't flowing, I started this when I bumped into a weird post which my guts led me right, and I intend to continue it from here, it doesn't really matter what you're saying to paint me bad.
If I can reduce the milkers, genuine authors can get rewarded.
And you're really right, am surely waiting for the whales, but only to hear them say whether or not am hinting at something. Whether or not an upvote follows it depends on if I deserve it and not because I want it badly. Get your attacks right...
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta