You cant take what someone with negative 4 rep says, whose comment is at the bottom of a post to be what any of us believe in
That minus 4 rep guy isnt anyones leader or someone who represents any of us at all. It is embarrassing to see someone claim steem or hive is cia.
We dont just care about rewards.
Trending page where all the whales upvote super bad content that can be found on Twitter or Instagram is 3x to 4x what the rewards are for our content. When will we see whales banding together to protect the rewards pool by zeroing out low effort posts making 200 to 400 usd, color challenges, travel blogs, food recipes that look gross, fluff nonsense about crypto prices going up with no analysis, most of trending inspire garbage.
Hive is going to see a huge influx of more and more of this and we look like a laugh stock. Super majority of posts on trending are hot garbage and worth almost nothing, stuff a 9th grader would blog about. And that isnt my or anyone in this groups doing.
I don't disagree, I've let it be for a while now as the pump just happened but it's not something people should get used to nor something we should accept long term. If you check ocdb's votes, there's maybe 1-2 posts per day that we give a bigger vote to (above 8%) as we want to give people realistic rewards. Cause of the recent spike we're also voting on many hbd.funder comments per day because there has not been that much of an influx of new users yet to make up for the increase in price and the rewards we can dish out. It wouldn't hurt for others to do the same or look for underrewarded posts than just keep stacking votes on the usual well earners.
Also you can't just scapegoat a -4 rep user when he's literally signing his main account - though I'm unsure how involved he's been or who is in what circle, etc.
Yeh I got no idea which the minua 4 rep guy is.
Thanks for your response.