Thanks! I am personally yet to see clear evidence that a 'better' government can achieve things better than a 'no government' would do - but we don't have a lot of data to go on because... governments don't tend to give up and go home - even as a friendly experiment.
I am reminded of the quote by Dan Larimer, co-inventor of Steem and EOS - his aim is to 'make governments irrelevant'. To do that we have to create something better AND get it noticed/used.
I totally agree. Trying to find the optimal balance between "good" centralized government and decentralization is like trying to find the perfect balance of socialism and capitalism. Good luck with that!