Thanks for your comment. It depends on what you exactly mean by "reasonable evidence", and on the objective of this article. As you should have noticed, this article is part of a series called "Financial Seeds", which I have been publishing for some months and which is intended to be a set of summary study guides for my students of Engineering Economics. They use the book I cited as the main book for the course, and the reason why I openly and publicly cite it is because I do not want any credit for what the original authors have written there. As a summary guide, I do not necessarily have to invent exercises and problems to illustrate concepts (sometimes I do it; sometimes I do not), because they are already in the book, and many other professors do the same. But what I do have to do is to try to make my students understand as much as possible the underlying concepts, based upon a re-arrangement of the original information, information complements, and detailed explanations. And that is precisely my contribution here. Concepts such as the capitalized cost (costo capitalizado) are well known and have been in the literature for a long time. In addition, the solution I present in my article for Example 11.1 is much more detailed than the one presented in the book. With regards to Example 11.2, the book does not present its solution, because it is a proposed problem, which I solve in its entirety to strengthen the procedure in my student's minds (another contribution); and the same can be said for Example 11.3: it is a proposed problem in the book (not solved there) which I solved for my students (another contribution). I will take care of what you suggested, but let me know if arbitrary decisions will be made in the future, because if that is the case, I will stop using your platform and instruct my students to do the same. Best regards.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
By the way, I attempted to send the same message in #appeals in DIscord and it is not working in my laptop. It does not open. Best regards.
In addition, some of the captures that you have presented as an "evidence" are just equations, which are given and cannot be changed. Ridicuolus! I declining the "reward" and leaving this platform now, bot!
Hi,
The post is a re-worded/spun version of the content in that book.
Possibly with the use of AI spinning.
You did not mention in the post that you are re-wording content from that book.
By not declining the rewards on the post, you submit it for monetisation and so automatically claim to be the author of the writing.
This is PLAGIARISM. If you tried to submit such an article to a University or as part of your book, you would face legal consequences in real life.
False. You are accussing me of plagiarism when you do not understand what has happened. This is an arbitrary response from you.
First of all, I have never used AI tools. Second, I have never said that I was writing a book (that is something that you are arbitrarily saying I have said). Summary study guides does not mean I am writing a book or I am using these for "my book". I already explained that I contributed with different things from the book and how I did it. Do you want me to decline the reward? I will do it and leave this platform. All my students will do the same tomorrow. Please, watch out with who you put to review these things. THe AI tool seems to be you! Best regards.
It was an example of what would happen if you did. Nowhere in that comment, does it make the assertion that you are writing any book right now.
Do you mean that your students that this is content from your students so they are plagiarising content not you?
If so are they aware that you monetise their content for yourself?
What are your students' usernames here, please?
There is a setting for how rewards are used when you write a post.
Hi rookie or should I call you bot? Remember that you suggested I used AI tools, so I can genuinely think that you are a bot, unable to properly connect facts and arguments, only following a script). Your words clearly show that your understanding of things is really poor and that you are making stupid connections only to justify your responses. What does it have to do the fact that I mentioned this summary study guide, as well as others I have published here, was intended to be a summary guide for my students with the fact they are plagiarising content? This is really a stupid connection. Besides, when I said I would instruct my students to leave this platform, I meant I would do it (and I already did it) because of your arbitrary behavior. However, they are free to leave or stay. In addition, when you replied "It was an example of what would happen if you did. Nowhere in that comment, does it make the assertion that you are writing any book right now.", you need to be careful about the contexts in which you use your words: you should have used a different phrase (ironically, re-wording is what you needed here), if what you really wanted to transmit was the idea that "Nowhere in that comment, does it make the assertion that you are writing any book right now.". Best regards.
It does not matter if the content was manually reworded/spun or by using a spinning tool.
Source:
Post:
What are the Hive usernames of your students on Hive, pleasr?
To confirm your authorship of the content as Luis B. Cirocco, could you please add the link to your Hive blog to your well-established social media account like Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter (which has not been recently created).
After you add the link, please respond to this comment with the URL link to that website.
You can remove this mention, once we confirm the authorship.
Thank you.
More Info: Introducing Identity/Content Verification Reporting & Lookup
Again, you are not getting the point. If "it does not matter if the content was manually reworded/spun or by using a spinning tool."?, why did you even mention it in your first replies? Be careful about what you write. Again, this is a summary study guide taken from the book I use with my students as the main book for Economics Engineering at Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado, Barquisimeto, with contributions on my side that I have already explained in my previous replies (rewording of some content to make it more clear, solution of proposed problems that are not solved in the book, etc.). It is logical that a summary guide of this nature has re-worded parts so that my students can better understand the concepts. If I wanted to write a completely original and innovative scientific paper, I would do it in the American Economic Review, not in Hive. I am the author of the blog I published in Hive, but as I said before, it is a study guide, with the book I mentioned included there as a reference and complement. I have not published this article anywhere else if that is what you want to know. My Twitter? It is @luishbc317. My Instagram? It is @vision4s; but again, I have not published this summary guide there. Regards, bot!
Hello.
Welcome to Hive.
To confirm your authorship of the content, could you please mention the word "Hive" somewhere in your Instagram profile?
https://www.instagram.com/vision4s/
You can remove this mention, once we confirm the authorship.
Thank you.
More Info: Introducing Identity/Content Verification Reporting & Lookup
Please, let me know how to decline the "reward" right now. I will do it. I already instructed my students to leave this arbitrary platform as soon as possible. I defended Hive a lot in the past but because of people like you I am leaving.