I have always been polite with you in all the way I could. Now I have a black mark on my nickname because you have been harassing me and therefore any post I will write will create problems to me and whoever will vote me. As you have learned fair-use is what I have been doing so far and I am glad you have recognised. It is a grey area and I am not playing with it... I like to share info I have found interesting in the large amount published every day. I pick 1 every day and I re-word it as much I like in order to have it easier to understand. I have written in the disclaimer everything I am legally required to do so being attacked even if I have done everything I could is not fair and I believe nobody likes it... am I wrong? I have been checking your posts since your day 1 and I have seen many 20 words posts but I have been attacked for 250-600 words posts with high reward.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It is absolutely not fair use as it is being monetised! And I stand by my opinion that you are doing nothing more than spinning other peoples work to farm rewards!
I have no influence on how others vote and I think you are insulting them if you think they cannot make up their own mind. Others have downvoted you a lot in the past I have just seen, is that due to my 'harassment' too?
Reward disagreement is a grey area but I downvoted you primarily because of you simply reposting someone else's work! You add zero opinion, zero additional value and then try to make it sound acceptable by posting a 'disclaimer'!
You are monetising and making money from someone else's work and that is wrong. It's that simple. You said before you have been a member for a long time. You know what you're doing but are now attempting to look like the injured party.
Don't forget that rewards are not yours until they are in your wallet. Anyone here can choose what to upvote or downvote, it's the very basis on which this blockchain is founded.
The number of words does not value a post, it's what the words say and their originality that does.
I did not give you a black mark against your name. We are all judged by what we post. Take some personal responsibility.
If you genuine wished to share someone else's work, then why not decline or limit reward? Post a link using @dbuzz and limit the payout to $1?
Please cut the BS and talk straight. You're here to farm the rewards and make money. You follow a curation trail with an auto voter that votes after the optimal 4m30s, you don't comment or read anyone else's posts! So at least be straight up about it.
So now we know where we stand. Community matters here. They decide. Not me, or Marky or anyone else. None of us are 'owed' anything here.
Post nice pictures of whales with some personal commentary, I might upvote. Post zero effort, spun Cointelegraph articles, I might downvote. Thats how its going to be.
As for what you do, that's your choice too, such is the beauty of this blockchain we are both using.
Seriously, have a great lunch break. I miss Greggs!
I don't like Greggs.. I rather prefer to have other stuffs LOL. Your is a fair point and I will not comment further on that. I stop writing news then... I can save time and it will be better for me and my name if that is seen in a bad way but seriously I have been spending time writing stuff like an idiot and not using tools as you said in the past. Anyway the mass has spoken and I have been penalised for that. I do apologise and I will go ahead!
Have a good one and to be honest I would love a pad thai or green curry rather than Greggs :)
Then with all sincerity, I wish you well and hope this can all be sorted.
You have a good one too.
I am thinking of creating a post... wait for a mention... but don't be afraid it is nothing bad ;)
I will look forward to it :-)
Green curry does sound yummy.