I actually think downvotes and curation are important, but when a group of people decide it is their job and spend hours a day in a chatroom talking about who to downvote and why... and are using community funds, they should stick to clearly defined guidelines and their stated purpose, which isn't to pick winners it's to fight abuse and plagiarism.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The problem comes when they decide to use that "antiabuse" stake for personal disagreement.
If they want to do that, get their own damn stake.
Well stated.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta