Then he sees a child, dying of hunger and takes care of that child and even finds a way to drop the child anonymously in a place where he’s sure the child will be taken care of. Granted, he’s a killer, but can we call him a bad person?
Yes we can still call him a bad person I think. One small good deed can't bring back the lives he killed. A serial killer would've destroyed families and relationships along with a life. I think there's enough justification here to label him as a bad guy but of course this is open to everyone's unique perspective and interpretation.
So, what makes a person either bad or good. Is it by the things the person does?
This is hard to say for those on the borderline but I think if there is a fair amount of people that lean towards one side then we can consider that person being good or bad but of course this is subject to change based on future actions :D. Like Ted Bundy everyone thought he was a good and chill guy and worked at a suicide hotline but little did people now he was a serial killer until it got exposed. Of course at this turning point we can consider him a bad guy lol.
Yeah, that's true. So sorry for the late reply. I understand what you mean though. Saving a kid's life doesn't exonerate the serial killer but you're right that if a person leans too much to a particular attribute then you can discern whether he is good or bad.
Thanks Shawn.
exactly o.o and your welcome haha no worries. means you got a lot of replies to do :)