Hello @mosin-nagant,
I'm writing from my personal account and not my Inkwell account, because I'd like to address you personally.
This is a wonderful story. It certainly held my attention. I really like your descriptions, of the people, the scenes and the creatures.
However (oh that dreaded however), the story does not pass our AI detectors. I believe you wrote this. It has the ring of originality to it. What likely happened is you used a program to edit. We only allow editing of basic punctuation (periods, commas, etc.) and spelling. Nothing else. Word arrangement, word choice--whatever a program might suggest--these edits are not acceptable.
Think about how you wrote this and how much feedback you might have received from a program. I know AI detectors are not perfect. I've run my writing through them and sometimes receive a positive reading, but a low positive reading. Yours was 68% confidence of AI content, and that is very, very high.
The Inkwell will not be curating the story because of the AI detection.
I think you are a very good writer with original ideas. I personally hope we see more stories from you.
I have never used AI at all. In my entire life. I have never used it. It all came purely from inside my head.
This accusation is very painful to hear. I feel like I still have the power of ideas, so why would I lower myself by using AI. I wrote it in one sitting, and I can because I am used to it.
I even still have the original manuscript before I translated it into English. I use Google Translator. In writing, I use a note application called Word Count. I use that to count the number of words to meet the requirements.
Furthermore, on the advice of the curator yesterday in my nonfiction writing, I copied the translation results into Google Docs. To perfect the translation results, I used Grammarly-I use the suggestion feature in that app. Again, this sounds pathetic to me @agmoore. I am accused of doing something I really avoid. I have been writing here since before AI was used. And I still do it without AI.
This is not an accusation, @mosin-nagant. It is a discussion. AI is troublesome. It weeps into our work sometimes when we don't invite it.
I believe this is entirely original. Writer to writer I liked what I read. My inclination was to look past the AI reading because I like the story so much. Perhaps the suggestion feature in Grammarly is what caused the reading. I frankly never recomment Grammarly because it seems to make suggestions that cause an AI reading. Can you share the original transcript with us? The translator also can trip an AI reading. We often like to run stories through the detector in the original language. That gives a cleaner reading.
Again, I respect you as a writer and accuse you of nothing. It is the detector that is alerts us to an issue.
Please do share the original manuscript.
Thank you.
Because I was curious, I also checked through a site called zerogpt.com. I copied my writing from Hive by removing all the markdown code, including the * sign to italicize sentences while the characters were talking. The result stated "Your Text is Human written". Please try checking again. I feel that the tool you are using has an error. I cannot justify and remain silent about an accusation that I have never done in my life. There must be something wrong with the checking program using the AI program you are using 🙏🙏🙏