You can't accuse an author of writing a text with AI without any evidence, otherwise it amounts to defamation.
Do you have evidence to refute the contrary? Great, in that case, show it. Otherwise, you should retract your statement and seriously reconsider your biases.
What would that bias be? What would be the basis of the bias? We know nothing about this writer except her writing. Defamation? We're curators. It's our job to make judgements. In this case we have a professional AI detector to guide us.
Let me see if I understand... You're accusing someone of using AI, using an AI yourself? That's the most hypocritical thing I've read in a long time.
So you think a person can't write well today without AI? I know this writer, I know her off-screen, and I know for a fact that she's a sincere person. Spanish is her native language; it's obvious she'll have a knack for writing well in that language. Or do writers of other languages have to follow a writing pattern so we don't get accused of falsifying our texts? Come on, this AI thing is getting out of hand.